74
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Long-term outcomes of over-the-scope clip for refractory gastrointestinal diseases

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 628-634 | Received 13 Aug 2020, Accepted 14 Dec 2020, Published online: 11 Jan 2021
 

Abstract

Background

The Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) can effectively treat refractory gastrointestinal diseases. However, most reports have focused on short-term effectiveness. We examined clinical outcomes of the deployed clips and long-term characteristics.

Material and methods

Of 47 patients with OTSC treatment, 35 with follow-up periods of ≥3 months were retrospectively examined. The indications were 11 bleedings, 17 perforations, and seven fistulas. The observation period was defined as medium-term (3 to <12 months) or long-term (≥12 months). The primary outcome was the clinical success rate without disease recurrence. The secondary outcomes were the complication rate, survival duration, and clip retention rate.

Results

The medium- and long-term clinical success rates were 100% during the observation period (median, 44 months; range, 3–78 months). The complication rate was 2.9% (n = 1). The median survival time was 1,634 days for bleeding, 1,757 days for perforation, and 444 days for fistulas. The overall clip retention rates were 56.4%, 38.1%, 30.9%, and 25.9% after one, six, and 12 months and at the final follow-up, respectively. The average clip retention duration was 244 days in bleeding, 656 days in perforations, and 188 days in fistulas.

Conclusions

Regardless of clip detachment, the OTSC can be effective in long-term.

Acknowledgement

We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Compliance with ethical standards

All data were entered into a central database at Kagawa University. This study was approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of Kagawa University Hospital (Registration number: 2019-187) and the ethics committees of the other two institutions that participated in the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the CONSORT checklist was followed. All patients provided written informed consent to undergo the procedures and participate in the study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.