60
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A survey of psychiatrists’ attitudes to schizoaffective disorder

&
Pages 25-30 | Received 11 Jul 2006, Published online: 12 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. Schizoaffective disorder is an established diagnosis in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, but research evidence relating to its nosological status and aetiology is conflicting. This study aimed to examine the attitudes of practising consultant psychiatrists, and to see whether there is a consensus about its classification and value in everyday clinical psychiatry. Method. A questionnaire was mailed to 2000 consultant psychiatrists drawn randomly from the membership list of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements about schizoaffective disorder and give some basic demographic data. Results. Of over 800 respondents, almost all reported using the diagnosis in clinical practice, but a small minority reported that they never use the diagnosis. Most psychiatrists considered the diagnosis to be clinically useful but there was little agreement about its nature, its relationship to other mental illnesses, its aetiology, or its characteristic clinical features. Conclusions. Schizoaffective disorder is an established diagnosis in psychiatric practice and is valued by clinicians but there is little consensus of opinion or practice in relation to it. Psychiatrists should be careful to use the diagnosis in accordance with current classificatory schemes, and further research should continue to investigate both its conceptual validity and its use in clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Sayeed Haque for statistical advice and to Professor Femi Oyebode for comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.