1,870
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Primary high-grade urothelial carcinoma of prostate with prostatic hyperplasia: a rare case report and review of the literature

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Article: 2252102 | Received 12 Jul 2023, Accepted 22 Aug 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023
 

Abstract

Background

Primary urothelial carcinoma in the prostate (UCP) is extremely rare and occurs most frequently in the bladder. There are only dozens of primary cases reported in the literature. Here, we describe a rare case of primary UCP and review the literature.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old widowed male, was referred to our hospital due to the frequency, and urgency of dysuria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination revealed prostate size was about 57 mm × 50 mm × 54 mm, increased prostatic transitional zone, and surrounding of prostatic duct indicate bar isointense T1, short T2, hyperintense DWI, and hyposignal ADC (PI-RADS 3); posterior of peripheral zone indicate patchy isointense T1, short T2, hyperintense DWI, and hyposignal ADC (PI-RADS 5). Subsequently, the patient underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy. Histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) assessments showed prostatic high-grade urothelial carcinoma with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finally, the patient underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Four months after surgery, CT plain and enhanced scan revealed thickening of the bladder wall. On further workup, cystoscopy revealed lymphoid follicular changes in the cut edge of the radical prostatectomy, and cystoscopic biopsies showed the malignant tumor.

Conclusions

Prostatic urothelial carcinoma should always be considered if the patient with severe lower urinary tract symptoms or hematuria, PSA, and digital rectal examination without abnormalities, without a personal history of urothelial cancer, but contrast-enhanced MRI showed the lesion located in the prostate. As of right now, radical surgical resections remain the most effective treatment. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The family patient’s informed written consent was obtained for the publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Consent to publish

Written informed consent was obtained from the family of the patient for the publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Author contribution

Design and drafting of the study: LL, FS, YX, and QW. Data curation: PZ, XY, and DW. Revision of the article: LL, FS, and QW. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.