602
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Mind the recognition gaps: layers of invisibility of farm migration in Norway

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2594-2611 | Received 23 Feb 2023, Accepted 23 Aug 2023, Published online: 05 Sep 2023
 

ABSTRACT

This article analyses the phenomenon of ‘invisible’ seasonal farm migrants, drawing on the case of labour migration to Norwegian agriculture. Based on ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews conducted between 2017 and 2020, with local stakeholders, farmers, and migrants, we employ the notions of (mis)recognition and recognition gaps to illustrate how various aspects of invisibility are the result of overlapping factors and practices, performed by the involved actors. Our analysis demonstrates how the established narrative of the normality of labour migration facilitates rendering the migrant workers invisible both in discursive and in institutional terms and reduces its function to a pure labour force. This is related to narratives about structural changes within agriculture that transformed the once intimate relationship between farmers and workers into a more impersonal employer-worker relationship. Finally, the situation of seasonal migrants can be understood as a ‘double absence’ as their lack of interaction with the local community and circular patterns of living deprive them of social reproduction and labour market opportunities in both the home and the host country. Thus, invisibility is a crucial component in normalising, legitimising, maintaining and reproducing the continued misrecognition of seasonal migrants.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Karen O'Reilly, Thomas Sætre Jakobsen, Johan Fredrik Rye, Mette Andersson and Kamila Fiałkowska for their insightful commentaries on the earlier versions of this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors‘ contributions

Both authors have contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

The research has been enabled by funding from the Norwegian Research Council (grant no: 261854/F10).