510
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Economic value of regular monitoring of response to treatment among US patients with chronic myeloid leukemia based on an economic model

, , , , &
Pages 1036-1040 | Received 30 May 2018, Accepted 31 Jul 2018, Published online: 15 Aug 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Regular molecular monitoring with reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of BCR-ABL1 transcripts is associated with reduced disease progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Molecular monitoring assists in the timely detection of primary or secondary resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and is a recommended practice by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. An economic model was developed to estimate the potential impact of CML monitoring vs lack of monitoring on patient healthcare costs.

Methods: An Excel-based decision-analytic economic model was developed from a US payer perspective. The model was used to estimate the expected healthcare cost differences between regular molecular monitoring of CML patients and lack of monitoring. CML progression rates among patients with vs without monitoring, the annual cost of CML progression, the average number of monitoring tests per year, and the average cost per RT-qPCR monitoring test were incorporated into the model. Univariate and multivariable sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: Based on estimates in published literature, disease progression to the accelerated/blast phase occurs among 0.35% of patients with monitoring and 5.12% of patients without monitoring, and the annual cost of CML progression is $136,308 per patient year. The analysis found that total healthcare costs, including the costs associated with CML progression and RT-qPCR monitoring tests (three tests per year), were $1,142 for patients with monitoring and $6,982 for patients without monitoring (difference = $5,840). In a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with CML, achieving a 100% monitoring rate was associated with a total cost-savings of $584,005 compared to a 0% monitoring rate. This cost-savings remained consistent under both univariate and multivariable sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Regular CML monitoring was associated with improved outcomes among CML patients and, consequently, reduced healthcare costs.

JEL classification codes:

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

EJ is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb. LRS and DM are full time employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. JL, MLS, and BM are employees of Novosys Health, which has received research funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb in connection with conducting this study and development of this manuscript. JME peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.