2,491
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gastroenterology

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of infliximab and its biosimilar in patients with refractory moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease using real world evidence in Thailand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1302-1310 | Received 26 May 2020, Accepted 21 Jul 2020, Published online: 13 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of infliximab and its biosimilar compared to conventional therapy in refractory moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) in Thailand.

Materials and methods

A Markov model was used to estimate lifetime costs and health benefits of infliximab from a societal perspective. Our analyses consisted of three choices of treatment (conventional therapy, infliximab originator, and biosimilar) and three treatment scenarios (infliximab 2 years and 3 years if relapse, infliximab 2 years and lifelong if relapse, and infliximab lifelong). The input parameters were obtained from the CD registry and systematic literature reviews. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2017 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty. Threshold sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the optimal drug prices. Finally, budget impact analyses were conducted.

Results

None of the scenarios was cost-effective at Thai willingness-to-pay threshold (4,706 USD/QALY gained). The lowest ICER of 30,121 USD/QALY gained was reported in the scenario that included only standard dose of infliximab biosimilar with the maximum of 5-year treatment. The drug prices need to be reduced by at least 72% to allow infliximab biosimilar to be cost-effective. The 5-year budget impact was only 695,958 USD for the current biosimilar price.

Conclusions

Infliximab for the treatment of refractory moderate-to-severe CD in Thailand would be cost-effective if the drug prices were significantly decreased. The best value for money strategy was infliximab biosimilar with a restricted duration of treatment.

    Key points

  • The use of infliximab and its biosimilar in a restricted duration of maximum 5-year is not cost-effective for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease refractory to conventional therapy, unless their price was lowered around 72–90% in Thailand.

  • The estimated budget impact for adopting infliximab or its biosimilar for such indication has potential financial feasibility. Policy makers may consider cost-effectiveness and budget impact findings as well as other aspects such as rarity of disease as a part of the decision making process.

JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES::

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This work was supported by Thai Food and Drug Administration (Thai FDA), Ministry of Public Health to support National List of Essential Medicine Selection Process of Thailand [grant numbers 119/2562 and 249/2562].

Declaration of financial/other relationships

PP, CK, JL, SA, PC, PiP, TK, ST, and NC declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, organization, and publication of this work.

JME peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

PP, CK, and NC participated in the study concept and design, data acquisition, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript drafting, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript.

JL and SA participated in the study concept and design, data acquisition, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript.

PC, PiP, TK, and ST participated in the study concept and design, data acquisition, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Thai FDA, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand for providing the opportunity and financial support for this work. The authors thank Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University for the data and Natchamol Tophol, research assistant, for collecting the data.

Previous presentations

This work was presented at International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Europe conference in Copenhagen, Denmark on November 6, 2019.

Notes

i Remsima, Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.