Abstract
Aim
The US Food and Drug Administration approved the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) to prevent pneumococcal disease. In the context of routine PCV20 vaccination, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness and public health and economic impact of a PCV20 catch-up program and estimated the number of antibiotic prescriptions and antibiotic-resistant infections averted.
Materials and methods
A population-based, multi-cohort, decision-analytic Markov model was developed using parameters consistent with previous PCV20 cost-effectiveness analyses. In the intervention arm, children aged 14–59 months who previously completed PCV13 vaccination received a supplemental dose of PCV20. In the comparator arm, no catch-up PCV20 dose was given. The direct and indirect benefits of vaccination were captured over a 10-year time horizon.
Results
A PCV20 catch-up program would prevent 5,469 invasive pneumococcal disease cases, 50,286 hospitalized pneumonia cases, 218,240 outpatient pneumonia cases, 582,302 otitis media cases, and 1,800 deaths, representing a net gain of 30,014 life years and 55,583 quality-adjusted life years. Furthermore, 720,938 antibiotic prescriptions and 256,889 antibiotic-resistant infections would be averted. A catch-up program would result in cost savings of $800 million. These results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.
Conclusions
A PCV20 catch-up program could prevent pneumococcal infections, antibiotic prescriptions, and antimicrobial-resistant infections and would be cost-saving in the US.
Transparency
Declaration of funding
This work was funded by Pfizer. Evidera received financial support from Pfizer in connection with the study and the development of this manuscript.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
AC, LH, AAM, MT, VS, EC, RF, and MR are employed by Pfizer Inc. RC and DDM are employed by Evidera Inc., which received financial support from Pfizer Inc. for this study and the development of this manuscript.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, MR, LH, AC, AA, RC, MT, VS, EC, and RF; formal analysis, MR and RC; methodology, MR, RC, EC, and RF; project administration, RC; supervision, MR; validation, MR and RC; visualization, RC; writing–original draft, MR, RC, and EC; writing–review and editing, MR, LH, AC, AA, RC, MT, VS, EC, and RF.
Acknowledgements
Medical writing support was provided by Dr. Ruth Sharf at Evidera, which was funded by Pfizer.
Data availability statement
All data analyzed in this study are included within the article or Supplementary Material.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.