450
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A negative view of menopause: does the type of symptom matter?

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 581-587 | Received 10 Aug 2016, Accepted 22 Sep 2016, Published online: 20 Oct 2016
 

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the association between the type of symptom and women’s self-reported view of menopause.

Methods: The study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, between January 2006 and October 2014. Women aged 40–64 were included. Data from 1420 women were analyzed in a cross-sectional design. The Menopause Health Questionnaire was used for symptom assessment. Odds ratios (ORs) and population attributable risk (PAR) (OR × percent frequency) were calculated for each symptom. Logistic regression analyses were performed with the view of menopause as the dependent variable.

Results: Anxiety (2.34), depressed mood (2.24), irritability (2.22), vaginal itching (2.27), crying spells (2.1) and breast tenderness (2.08) were associated with highest odds of having a negative view of menopause. Highest PAR (population impact) symptoms were anxiety (22.27), weight gain (20.66), fatigue (20.28) and irritability (19.41). Hot flushes and night sweats, although common, were not associated with a negative view of menopause (OR 1.3 and 1.16; PAR 3.85 and 4.42, respectively).

Conclusion: Mood symptoms, vaginal itching, weight gain, breast tenderness and fatigue, although less common than hot flushes, were noted to have greater association with a negative view of menopause. Specifically addressing these symptoms during menopausal consultation may improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The corresponding author, Richa Sood, MD, affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Source of funding

Nil. IRB Approval – IRB no: 11-004280

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.