245
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire and the Sialorrhea Clinical Scale in Portuguese patients with Parkinson’s disease

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 163-170 | Received 08 Feb 2020, Accepted 29 Jun 2020, Published online: 10 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

Introduction

To date, no valid outcome measure has been developed in European Portuguese (EP) to evaluate the Parkinsons’ Disease (PD) patients' (PwP) reports regarding their swallowing disturbances.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Sialorrhea Clinical Scale for PD (SCS-PD) into EP and to determine its clinimetric properties in PwP.

Materials and Methods

The original English SDQ and SCS-PD versions were cross-culturally adapted following recommendations established in international guidelines. The validation process involved 75 PwP and 65 healthy sex- and age-matched participants.

Results

The EP versions of the SDQ and SCS-PD are equivalent to the original versions (content, depth, and scoring). Statistical analyses for the SDQ tool revealed good feasibility (missing data <5%), acceptability (no floor or ceiling effects), excellent internal consistency (Cronbach´s α = 0.95), good construct validity (78.5% revealed large to moderate loadings), moderate convergent validity (r = 0.60), good divergent validity (r = 0.40), good known-groups validity (p-value < .05) and a fair sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.700). Statistical analyses for the SCS-PD tool shows good feasibility, reasonable acceptability (floor effect), good internal consistency (Cronbach´s α = 0.85), good construct validity (85.7% showed between large to moderate loadings), good convergent validity (r = 0.78), good divergent validity (r = 0.39), good known groups validity (p-value < .05) and a fair sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.704).

Conclusions

The EP versions of the SDQ and SCS-PD maintained the characteristics of the original versions and therefore consistent tools to be used in PwP.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Ana Rita Cardoso

Ana Rita Cardoso is a Speech and Language Therapist (SLT) at the Campus Neurológico Sénior (CNS).

Isabel Guimarães

Isabel Guimarães is a SLT and a Lecturer at the Department of Speech Therapy, Alcoitão Health School of Sciences.

Helena Santos

Helena Santos and Joana Carvalho are SLT, at the CNS.

Joana Carvalho

Helena Santos and Joana Carvalho are SLT, at the CNS.

Daisy Abreu

Daisy Abreu and Nilza Gonçalves are statisticians at IMM, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon.

Nilza Gonçalves

Daisy Abreu and Nilza Gonçalves are statisticians at IMM, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon.

Joaquim J. Ferreira

Joaquim J. Ferreira is a neurologist, an associate professor at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon and Medical director of CNS.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.