Abstract
Objectives: To compare the quantitative performance for measuring anti-MDA5 antibody titer of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) systems: an in-house ELISA and the commercial MESACUPTM anti-MDA5 test.
Methods: Anti-MDA5 antibody titer was measured in sera from 70 patients with dermatomyositis using an in-house ELISA and the MESACUPTM anti-MDA5 test side-by-side. For the commercial ELISA kit, serum samples diluted 1:101 were used according to the manufacturer’s protocol, but serial dilutions of sera were also examined to identify the optimal serum dilution for quantification.
Results: The anti-MDA5 antibody titers measured by the in-house and commercial ELISAs were positively correlated with each other (r = 0.53, p = .0001), but the antibody titer measured by the commercial ELISA was less sensitive to change after medical treatment, and 37 (80%) of 46 anti-MDA5-positive sera had antibody titer exceeding the quantification range specified by the manufacturer (≥150 index). Experiments using diluted serum samples revealed that diluting the sera 1:5050 improved the quantitative performance of the MESACUPTM anti-MDA5 test, including a better correlation with the in-house ELISA results and an increased sensitivity to change.
Conclusion: We improved the ability of the commercial ELISA kit to quantify anti-MDA5 antibody titer by altering its protocol.
Conflict of interest
M. Kuwana holds a patent on an anti-MDA5 antibody measuring system. M. Kuwana has received grant/research support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, and Pfizer; and has participated in speaker bureaus for AbbVie, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Japan Blood Products Organization, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, and Pfizer. A. Murakami is an employee of Medical and Biological Laboratories. The remaining authors state that they have no conflict of interest.