Abstract
Objectives: Compare outcomes with methotrexate (MTX) or etanercept (ETN) monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were MTX-naïve or with intolerance or inadequate response to prior MTX (MTX-IR).
Methods: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study comparing MTX, ETN 10 mg twice weekly, and ETN 25 mg twice weekly in Japanese patients with RA. Disease activity was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), radiographic progression evaluated using van der Heijde’s modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS), and functional status evaluated using Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Results: Among MTX-naïve and MTX-IR patients, greater proportions of those randomized to either ETN group achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, DAS28 ≤3.2 or <2.6, clinically relevant inhibition of mTSS changes, and reductions in HAQ-DI compared with MTX at the majority of time points. There were very few clinically meaningful differences between ETN groups for any of the variables evaluated.
Conclusion: ETN monotherapy was more effective than MTX in both MTX-naïve and MTX-IR patients, with very few clinically meaningful differences between ETN 10 mg and ETN 25 mg when given twice weekly. The relative benefits of ETN were greater in MTX-naïve patients than MTX-IR patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
NCT00445770
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Medical writing support was provided by Sabrina Giavara, PhD, and David Wateridge, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions (Horsham, UK) and funded by Pfizer.
Conflict of interest
TT declares research grants from Abbott Japan Co, Ltd; Astellas Pharma; Bristol-Myers KK; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd; Eisai Co, Ltd; Janssen Pharmaceutical KK; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co; Nippon Shinyaku Co, Ltd; Otsuka Pharmaceutical; Pfizer Japan Inc; Sanofi-Aventis KK; Santen Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; and Teijin Pharma Ltd. TT declares acting as a consultant for AstraZeneca KK; Eli Lilly Japan KK; Novartis Pharma KK; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co; and Asahi Kasei Medical KK. NM declares no conflict of interest. RP, NS, and TH are employees of Pfizer and hold stock in Pfizer.
Data sharing statement
Upon request, and subject to certain criteria, conditions and exceptions (see https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results for more information), Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data from Pfizer-sponsored global interventional clinical studies conducted for medicines, vaccines and medical devices (1) for indications that have been approved in the US and/or EU or (2) in programs that have been terminated (i.e. development for all indications has been discontinued). Pfizer will also consider requests for the protocol, data dictionary, and statistical analysis plan. Data may be requested from Pfizer trials 24 months after study completion. The de-identified participant data will be made available to researchers whose proposals meet the research criteria and other conditions, and for which an exception does not apply, via a secure portal. To gain access, data requestors must enter into a data access agreement with Pfizer.