Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 27, 2024 - Issue 1
452
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reproductive outcomes in patients with high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation using testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic injection: a retrospective analysis

, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2338290 | Received 11 Sep 2023, Accepted 27 Mar 2024, Published online: 11 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

This study aims to compare the embryological and clinical parameters of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using testicular versus ejaculated sperm in male patients with elevated sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). A total of 73 ICSI cycles were examined in couples where the male partner exhibited high levels of SDF. ICSI was performed using either ejaculated or testicular sperm. The primary outcomes were rates of blastocyst formation, high-quality embryo development, and clinical pregnancy. The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) for testicular sperm (16.81 ± 17.51) was significantly lower than that of ejaculated sperm (56.96 ± 17.56). While the blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher in the testicular sperm group compared to the ejaculated sperm group, no statistically significant differences were noted in fertilization rate (72.15% vs. 77.23%), rate of high-quality embryo formation (47.17% vs. 46.53%), clinical pregnancy (50% vs. 56.52%), Cumulative pregnancy (70.2% vs. 55.6%), or live birth rate (43.75% vs.43.48%). Testicular spermatozoa have no additional advantage over ejaculated spermatozoa except for blastocyst quality in patients with high SDF, the use of testicular spermatozoa for the first ICSI cycle in male infertility patients with high SDF should be undertaken after much consideration at present.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the reproductive ethics committee of the authors’ hospital. Reproductive Medicine Professional Ethics Committee Review (2019) No. (11).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics(22HZSY0051)Science and Technology Plan Project of Wenzhou, China (Y20180675)