Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference

Abstract

Processes of state-society engagement around urban development issues, termed co-production, have been documented in both the Public Administration and Development Studies fields, but until recently have not attracted much attention in planning. Yet, particularly more recent approaches and cases of co-production from global South contexts do offer the possibility of adding to planning debates in this area, by expanding the context which shapes planning ideas beyond the global North, and perhaps shifting planning theory in the direction of becoming truly international. The paper identifies the important differences which underlie various strands of thinking about co-production, and also between these and planning assumptions in the area of collaborative and communicative planning.

Keywords::

• co-production
• state-society engagement
• communicative and collaborative planning
• global South
• Shack/Slum Dwellers International
• Asian Coalition for Housing Rights

Notes

^1.www.achr.net

^2. See special issue of Environment and Urbanization (April, 2012) which has articles on a number of cases of co-production in Africa and Asia, previous issues of this journal, the SDI website, and the ACHR website: http://www.achr.net/achrdownloads.htm

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Vanessa Watson

Vanessa Watson convenes the City and Regional Planning Programme at the University of Cape Town; is executive committee member of the African Centre for Cities and co-chair of the Association of African Planning Schools.