Application of amniotic membrane in reconstructive urology; the promising biomaterial worth further investigation

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In reconstructive urology, autologous tissues such as intestinal segments, skin, and oral mucosa are used. Due to their limitations, reconstructive urologists are waiting for a novel material, which would be suitable for urinary tract wall replacement. Human amniotic membrane (AM) is a naturally derived biomaterial with a capacity to support reepithelization and inhibit scar formation. AM has a potential to become a considerable asset for reconstructive urology, i.e., reconstruction of ureters, urinary bladder, and urethrae.

Areas covered: This review aims to discuss the potential application of human AM in reconstructive urology. The environment for urinary tract healing is particularly unfavorable due to the presence of urine. Due to its fetal origin, the bioactivity of AM is orientated to induce intrinsic regeneration mechanisms and inhibit scarring. This review introduces the concept of applying human AM in reconstructive urology procedures to improve their outcomes and future tissue engineering based strategies.

Expert opinion: Many fields of medicine that have accomplished translational research have proven the usefulness of AM in clinical practice. There is an urgent need for studies to be conducted on large animal models that might convincingly demonstrate the underestimated potential of AM to urologists around the world.

KEYWORDS:

• Amniotic membrane
• biomaterials
• tissue engineering
• reconstructive urology
• regeneration

Article Highlights

• Introduction of AM histology

• Bioactive properties determining AM usability for reconstructive urology

• AM technology

• Limitations of current reconstructive urology strategies

• Enhancement of healing process by AM

Animal studies and human trials evaluating AM for urinary tract reconstruction

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.