ABSTRACT
Objectives: To investigate the impact of EGFR mutations on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies. Efficacy outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall disease progression, local-regional recurrence (LRR), distant progression (DP), brain metastasis, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Meta-analysis was performed when relevant data were available.
Results: The authors identified seven eligible studies including 695 patients. No significant difference was detected in ORR (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.39, P = 0.28) and overall disease progression (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95–1.19, P = 0.29) between EGFR-mutant and EGFR-wild-type groups. EGFR-mutant group had significantly lower LRR (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33–0.72, P < 0.01), higher DP (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18–1.55, P < 0.01) and higher brain metastasis (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.46–4.20, P < 0.01) than the EGFR-wild-type group. No sufficient data were available to perform pooled analysis regarding PFS and OS.
Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive CRT, the presence of EGFR mutations may be indicative of lower locoregional recurrence and higher distant progression, especially brain metastasis.
Authors’ contributions
Q Qin and B Peng participated in the design of the study and performed the articles research, data extraction and analysis. Q Qin wrote the manuscript. B Li conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
A reviewer on this manuscript has disclosed that they have received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD and Roche. All other peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.
Supplementary Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.