Abstract
Purpose: We sought to determine if administration of antenatal corticosteroids in early preterm births (<34 weeks) is associated with an increased risk of developing neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) within the first 48 h of neonatal life.
Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort of all indicated singleton preterm births (23−34 weeks) in a single tertiary center from 2011 to 2014. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) within the first 48 h of life. The outcome was compared by antenatal corticosteroids received at any point during the gestation, within 2–7 d of delivery, and whether the patient received a partial, full, or repeat course of antenatal corticosteroids. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.
Results: Six hundred thirty-five patients underwent an indicated preterm birth during the study period. Six hundred and four (95%) received antenatal corticosteroids prior to delivery and 31 (5%) did not. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia within 48 h of life was not significantly different between those who received any antenatal corticosteroids and those who did not (23.0 versus 16.1%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95%CI 0.5–3.6). Infants who received a full antenatal corticosteroid course within 2–7 d of delivery had similar incidences of hypoglycemia compared with those who received antenatal corticosteroids more than 7 d before delivery (20.4 versus 25.4%, adjusted OR 1.5, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.8–2.9). Neonatal hypoglycemia was not increased by the number of antenatal corticosteroid doses (partial, full, or repeat course) administered. There was not a correlation between timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration before delivery, up to 250 h, and the lowest neonatal blood sugar in the first 48 h of life.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest antenatal corticosteroid administration in indicated early preterm infants (<34 weeks) may not increase the risk of developing neonatal hypoglycemia within the first 48 h of life. Further studies should validate our findings.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Details of ethics approval
This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (X150826006).