152
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Fetal speckle-tracking echocardiography: a comparison between two-dimensional and electronic spatio-temporal image correlation (e-STIC) technique

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 6090-6096 | Received 15 Oct 2020, Accepted 18 Mar 2021, Published online: 06 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Speckle tracking technology has been applied to assess ventricular deformation throughout the cardiac cycle. An electronic four dimensional probe that allows rapid acquisition of electronic spatio-temporal image correlation volumes (eSTIC) has been recently introduced.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to investigate whether e-STIC acquisition improves deformation analyses reproducibility.

Study design

We recruited fetuses between 20 and 40 weeks of gestation. We obtained a 2D video clip and an e-STIC volume of a four-chamber view. We focused on left ventricular global strain (LV-GS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-FE). Intraobserver, interobserver and intermethod agreement were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and illustrated by Bland-Altman plots. Systematic differences between measurements were assessed using a paired t-test.

Results

The mean difference between LV-GS values obtained with e-STIC and 2D analysis was −0.10 (95% CI −2.28, 2.08). No systematic differences were found between the two techniques for LV-GS values (p-value = .927). The mean difference between LV-FE values obtained with e-STIC and 2D analysis was 7.55 (95% CI 4.16, 10.95; p-value <.001). The inter-rater reliability of LV-GS was moderate-to-substantial for both e-STIC and 2D. The inter-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis. The intra-rater reliability of LV-GS obtained with e-STIC was superior to that obtained with 2D analysis (ICC 0.857; 95% IC 0.761–0.917). The intra-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis (ICC 0.647; IC 0.51–0.783).

Conclusions

e-STIC seems to be a better technique than 2D analysis for intra-rater reliability of LV-GS. 4D acquisition might improve intrinsic limitations of speckle tracking echocardiography.

Acknowledgment

The authors report no acknowledgements.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.