47
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Use of gestation adjusted projection method for predicting fetal head circumference

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 6836-6840 | Received 30 Mar 2021, Accepted 03 May 2021, Published online: 13 May 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.

Methods

This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32–36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HCBIRTH) by measures of error and with paired t-tests. McNemar’s test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.

Results

None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP’s performance remained good.

Conclusion

The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HCBIRTH with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HCBIRTH could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors. There was no funding or grants for this research project. Presentation Information: 41st Annual Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine Meeting, Virtual, 25–30 January 2021 with poster presentation, abstract #654, on 29 January 2021.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.