Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) may greatly impact fertility, predisposing to pregnancy and obstetric complications. The impact of mild IUAs on reproductive performance remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to examine the long-term reproductive outcomes in women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs mild intrauterine adhesions (IUAs)

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2019. All prospective cohort, cross-sectional studies or randomized controlled trials Clinical trials in which reproductive outcomes of women with mild IUAs, were reported were included.

Results

Five studies, reporting on reproductive outcomes of 229 women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs, were included. The pregnancy rate was 62.3% (142 of 228; 95% CI: 0.55–0.72, I² 25%, p = .21) and in 86.6% (123 of 142) a live birth was encountered (95% CI: 0.71–0.97) with 83.1% (108 out of 130) term deliveries (95% CI: 0.53–0.95). A miscarriage was reported in 10% (13 of 130; 95% CI: 0.02–0.26). Due to the lack of a control group, reproductive outcomes were compared to a general population. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly lower in women with identified and treated mild IUAs, 90% versus 62.3% and respectively 99.5% versus 86.6%. The miscarriage rate was similar. Data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are lacking.

Conclusions

Women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs seem to have lower pregnancy and live birth rate compared to the general population. Future studies consisting of a large cohort of women with hysteroscopic identified and treated IUAs with structural follow-up and a control group are needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords:

• Intrauterine adhesions
• reproductive outcome
• hysteroscopy
• fertility
• live birth rate

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Linda Kos for her contribution in search developing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).