92
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Neonatal morbidity in a low volume forceps practice

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 7986-7991 | Received 28 Dec 2020, Accepted 04 Jun 2021, Published online: 14 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Currently, the use of FE is decreasing and neonatal adverse outcomes following FE are underreported. We aimed to evaluate the rate of neonatal adverse outcomes in current obstetric practice at two university hospitals with a low FE volume.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective study. All singleton pregnancies delivered by forceps extraction between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. The characteristics of the deliveries with a composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO) were analyzed and compared with those without.

Results

The study cohort included 861 neonates delivered by FE. The CNAO was recorded in 131 (15.2%). Women in the CNAO group gained less weight during pregnancy (mean 13 kg vs. 15 kg, p = .014). Factors found to be associated with CNAO were preterm delivery (gestational age < 37°/7) (26 (19.8%) vs. 44 (6.0%), OR [95% CI]: 3.86 (2.28–6.52), p < .001), low birth weight (23 (17.6%) vs. 44 (6.0%), OR [95% CI] 3.32 (1.92–5.71), p < .001), and smaller head circumference (329 vs. 331 mm, OR [95% CI] 0.79 (0.67–0.93), p = .035). In a multivariate analysis, gestational age (adjusted OR [95% CI] 0.672 (0.546–0.826), p < .001) and maternal weight gain during pregnancy (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.950 (0.904–0.998), p = .042), were both negatively associated with CNAO. Among term deliveries, the only factor found to be independently associated with CNAO was maternal weight gain during pregnancy (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.951 (0.910–0.994), p = .025).

Conclusions

In the setting of low volume FE, this mode of delivery is associated with a relatively low rate of neonatal morbidity.

Synopsis

Performance of forceps extraction in the setting of low volume practice is associated with a relatively low rate of neonatal morbidity.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.