234
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rescue antenatal corticosteroids and neonatal outcomes in twin gestation

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 7337-7343 | Received 20 Apr 2021, Accepted 21 Jun 2021, Published online: 05 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Objective

Although repeated antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) courses are not recommended, a single rescue ACS course has been shown to decrease neonatal morbidity among preterm singletons. However, little is known regarding the effects of rescue ACS course in twin pregnancies.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study conducted during 2015–2017 at a tertiary-care center including all twins delivered between 24–34 weeks of gestation who received at least one course of ACS.

Results

Overall, 162 (70.4%) twins were exposed to a single ACS course and 68 (29.6%) to an additional rescue ACS course. Rescue ACS course was associated with lower rates of respiratory distress syndrome (7.4% vs. 19.1%, p = .03), surfactant use (7.4% vs 18.5%, p = .04) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (0 vs 8.6%, p = .01) as compared to a single ACS course. In the rescue ACS group, compared to the single ACS group, the rates of composite respiratory adverse outcome (10.3% vs 22.2%, OR [95% CI]: 0.40 (0.17–0.95), p = .04) and any adverse neonatal outcome (13.2% vs 26.5%, OR [95% CI]: 0.42 (0.19–0.92), p = .04) were significantly lower. Hospital stay was also shorter among neonates born to mothers receiving a rescue ACS course (median 23 vs. 30 days, p = .01). No differences were noted in neonatal birthweight, head circumference and the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

Rescue ACS course was associated with improved respiratory and neonatal outcomes in twin gestations. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and better delineate the optimal regimen of rescue ACS in this setting.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the local institutional review board of Hadassah Medical Center Helsinki Committee (IRB approval number No. HMO 0156-18).

Authors' contribution

AR, RZ, IE, JIR, SP, SY and MR reviewed the literature and wrote the paper. AR performed the statistical analyses for this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.