1,660
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Chance of healthy versus adverse outcome in subsequent pregnancy after previous loss beyond 16 weeks: data from a specialized follow-up clinic

, , , , &
Article: 2165062 | Received 24 Aug 2022, Accepted 01 Jan 2023, Published online: 11 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

Women with a previous fetal demise have a 2–20 fold increased risk of another stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy when compared to those who have had a live birth. Despite this, there is limited research regarding the management and outcomes of subsequent pregnancies. This study was conducted to accurately quantify the chances of a woman having a healthy subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy loss.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary-level unit between March 2019 and April 2021. We collected data on all women with a history of previous fetal demise attending a specialized perinatal history clinic and compared the risk of subsequent stillbirth to those with a normal pregnancy outcome. Outcome data included birth outcome, obstetric and medical complications, gestational age and birth weight and mode of delivery. Those who had healthy subsequent pregnancies were compared with those who experienced adverse outcomes.

Results

A total of 101 cases were reviewed. Ninety-six women with subsequent pregnancies after a history of fetal demise from 16 weeks were included. Seventy-nine percent of women (n = 76) delivered a baby at term, without complications. Overall, 2.1% had repeat pregnancy losses (n = 2) and 2.1% delivered babies with fetal growth restriction (n = 2). There were no cases of abruption in a subsequent pregnancy. Eighteen neonates were delivered prematurely (18.4%), 15 of these (83.3%) were due to iatrogenic causes and three (16.7%) were spontaneous. In univariable logistic regression analyses, those with adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies had greater odds of pre-eclampsia (Odds ratio *(OR) = 3.89, 95% CI = 1.05–14.43, p = .042) and fetal growth restriction (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.41–14.82, p = 0.011) in previous pregnancies compared to those with healthy outcomes. However, in multivariable logistic regression analyses, neither variable had a significant odds ratio (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 0.44–9.39, p = .366 and OR = 3.42, 95% CI = 0.90 − 13.09, p = .072 for pre-eclampsia and FGR, respectively).

Conclusion

Four in five women had a healthy subsequent pregnancy. This is a reassuring figure for women when contemplating another pregnancy, particularly if cared for in a specialist clinic.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Prof Dimitrios Siassakos and Dr Melissa Whitten for their guidance, support, and mentorship throughout the research project. Thank you to Dr Bassel Al Wattar and Dr Aviva Petrie for their statistical analysis and support. Also, I would like to thank the Women’s Health Department.

Author contributions

All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

Ethical approval

As this was a service review, no ethical approval was needed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work did not receive any funding.