Abstract
Background
Spontaneous preterm birth occurs more frequently in multiple pregnancies. This syndrome has multiple triggers that result in a unified downstream pathway of cervical remodeling, uterine activity, and progressive cervical dilatation. Whilst the triggers for labor in multiple pregnancy may be different from singletons, the downstream changes will be the same. Identifying patients at risk of preterm birth is a priority as interventions to delay delivery and optimize the fetus can be initiated. Methods for screening for risk of preterm birth which focus on the detection of cervical remodeling may therefore have potential in this population.
Methods
This review explores the evidence for the predictive utility for preterm birth of several published techniques that assess the physical, biomechanical, and optical properties of the cervix, with a focus on those which have been studied in multiple pregnancies and highlighting targets for future research in this population.
Results
Fifteen techniques are discussed which assess the physical, biomechanical, and optical properties of the cervix in pregnancy. Of these, only three techniques that evaluated the predictive accuracy of a technique in patients with multiple pregnancies were identified: uterocervical angle, cervical consistency index, and cervical elastography. Of these, measurement of the uterocervical angle has the strongest evidence. Several techniques have shown predictive potential in singleton pregnancies, but have not yet been studied in multiple pregnancies, which would be a logical expansion of research.
Conclusion
Research on techniques with predictive utility for PTB in patients with multiple pregnancies is limited but should be a research priority. Overall, the theory supports the investigation of cervical remodeling as a predictor of PTB, and there are numerous techniques in development that may have potential in this field.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this manuscript as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.