272
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Treatment of chikungunya musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review

, , , , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 333-344 | Received 03 Jan 2018, Accepted 07 Mar 2018, Published online: 14 Mar 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Chikungunya virus is amongst the fastest expanding vector transmissible diseases in recent years and has been causing massive epidemics in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. Despite human infection by this virus being first described in the 1950s, there is a lack of adequate therapeutic evaluations to guide evidence-based recommendations. The current guidelines rely heavily in specialists’ opinion and experience instead of using higher rated evidence.

Areas covered: A systematic review of the literature was performed- not restricted to clinical trials – reporting the therapeutic response against this infection with the intent to gather the best evidence of the treatment options against musculoskeletal disorders following chikungunya fever. The 15 studies included in the analysis were categorized considering the initiation of treatment during the acute, subacute and chronic phase.

Expert commentary: This review demonstrates the complexity of chikungunya fever and difficulty of therapeutic management. This review found no current evidence-based treatment recommendations for the musculoskeletal disorders following chikungunya fever. To provide an optimal treatment that prevents perpetuation or progression of chikungunya infection to a potentially destructive and permanent condition without causing more harm is an aim that must be pursued by researchers and health professionals working with this disease.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. A reviewer on this manuscript has disclosed that they work with two laboratories to develop a CHIKV vaccine candidate with Valneva and a monoclonal antibody with Sanofi. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript has not been funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.