2,780
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Audiological approaches to address the psychosocial needs of adults with hearing loss: perceived benefit and likelihood of use

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 12-19 | Received 24 Aug 2020, Accepted 15 Oct 2020, Published online: 11 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

To explore the perceived benefit and likely implementation of approaches used by audiologists to address their adult clients’ psychosocial needs related to hearing loss.

Design

Adults with hearing loss and audiologists completed separate, but related, surveys to rate their perceived benefit and also their likely use of 66 clinical approaches (divided over seven themes) that aim to address psychosocial needs related to hearing loss.

Study sample

A sample of 52 Australian adults with hearing loss, and an international sample of 19 audiologists.

Results

Overall, participants rated all of the approaches highly on both benefit and likelihood of use; the highest ranked theme was Providing Emotional Support. Cohort comparisons showed that audiologists ranked the approaches significantly higher than did adults with hearing loss. Overall, participants ranked the themes higher on benefit than on the likelihood to use scales.

Conclusions

Adults with hearing loss and audiologists recognise the importance of approaches that address the psychosocial impacts of hearing loss in audiological rehabilitation. However, both groups placed slightly greater value on the internal-based approaches (the clients own emotional response, empowerment, and responsibility), and slightly less emphasis on the external-based approaches (being supported by communication partners, support groups or other health professionals).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ear Science Institute Australia for assisting with participant recruitment and participants for their time.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. Barbra Timmer and Gurjit Singh are employed in research capacities by Sonova AG.

The authors thank Sonova AG, Switzerland for providing funding this project.