1,792
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Research

Fewer adverse effects with a modified two-bag acetylcysteine protocol in paracetamol overdose

, , &
Pages 618-621 | Received 13 Sep 2017, Accepted 16 Nov 2017, Published online: 08 Dec 2017
 

Abstract

Objective: Acetylcysteine (NAC), an effective antidote for paracetamol poisoning, is commonly associated with adverse reactions. This has been postulated to be related to the rapid initial infusion rate (150 mg/kg over 1 h) of the traditional three-bag protocol. We hypothesized that a slower rate would result in fewer adverse reactions. Our institution in Western Sydney moved to a modified two-bag protocol in February 2015 – first bag: 200 mg/kg over 4 h (50 mg/kg/h) and second bag: (100 mg/kg over 16 h).

Methods: Data was extracted from our database on paracetamol overdoses treated with NAC from August 2010 to September 2016. We compared adverse reactions in patients receiving the modified two-bag protocol with a historical control (traditional three-bag regimen with initial bolus of 150 mg/kg/h).

Results: Over the study period 1011 paracetamol poisonings presented to our toxicology service, of which 476 required NAC (three-bag = 313, two-bag = 163). Demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Fewer anaphylactoid reactions (itch, rash, and swelling) occurred using the two-bag regimen (14% versus 5%, p = .002), a relative reduction of 66%. Similarly, there were fewer prescriptions of anti-allergy medications in the two-bag group (11% versus 4%, p = .01). There was no difference in incidence of hepatotoxicity.

Conclusions: Adverse reactions to NAC were less common with the two-bag regimen. These results add to the accumulating evidence that reducing the initial NAC infusion rate reduces the risk of adverse reactions.

Acknowledgements

We thank Adrienne Kirby of NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia, for statistical analysis.

Disclosure statement

We affirm that there are no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose. We have no funding grants to declare.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.