Enlivening popular education in community development: Action research with neighborhood Centres and Landcare groups in Australia

ABSTRACT

This article, drawing on an action research project, argues for the revitalized use of two under-utilized practice frameworks for community development in the pursuit of social change. The two frameworks – Participatory Development Practice and the Spiral Model of Community Education – support a citizen-led approach to practice, one that focuses on the relational and dialogical elements of group processes. Starting with stories of citizens’ lived experiences, a structural or community analysis about the root causes of oppression is enabled and supports community action that can be sustained over time. Findings from the action research showed that groups benefitted from foregrounding their own need for social sustainability and that the educational approach of Freire helped them shift from an antagonistic conflict mode to a dialogical or agonistic conflict mode which created confidence to engage in difficult conversations supporting their community development efforts.

KEYWORDS:

• Participatory development practice
• spiral model of community education
• neighborhood centers
• landcare

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Peak bodies in Australia represent an entire sector of industry or the community to government, undertaking advocacy, promotion, training, and networking with member organizations.

2. In Australia, a “hoon” is a pejorative term for a person who deliberately drives a vehicle in a reckless or dangerous manner to provoke a reaction from onlookers.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of the Sunshine Coast’s Industry Collaboration Grant.