ABSTRACT
Objective
To investigate the prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin (ALB) and the lactate dehydrogenase/albumin ratio (LAR) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) before primary treatment.
Methods
The clinical data of 212 primary adult DLBCL patients admitted to the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The optimal cutoff values of LDH, ALB, and LAR were determined using ROC curves. Survival curves of LDH, ALB, and LAR were plotted and analyzed using the Cox regression model and Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test.
Results
Among the 212 patients admitted, the study derived the optimal cutoff values for ALB, LDH, and LAR as 38, 301, and 6, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test analysis indicated a significant association between lower ALB levels, elevated LDH levels, elevated LAR levels, and shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the critical values of ALB and LDH were grouped into three categories. The differences in OS and PFS among these three groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Cox multifactorial analysis revealed that the LAR was an independent factor influencing the prognosis of OS and PFS, with a higher prognostic value than LDH and ALB alone.
Conclusion
Decreased ALB levels and elevated LDH and LAR levels at the time of initial diagnosis are indicative of a poor prognosis in DLBCL patients. Furthermore, the study highlighted that the LAR has a higher prognostic value than LDH and ALB alone.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Ethical approval
From January 2017 to December 2022, 212 patients with DLBCL were eligible for the study and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province. (Institutional Review Board [IRB] no. KY-20220620002-01).
Informed consent statement
The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the IRB because of study subjects’anonymity and minimal risk to patients.