201
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Separating toxicity and shading in algal growth inhibition tests of nanomaterials and colored substances

ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 265-275 | Received 27 Feb 2022, Accepted 17 May 2022, Published online: 12 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

Nanoparticles and colored substances can inhibit algal growth by light shading and chemical toxicity. This study presents two complementary approaches to account for shading in algal growth inhibition tests of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and colored substances. The first approach distinguishes between shading effects and toxicity by varying the light path in parallel algal growth inhibition tests. This Multiple Path-Length (MPL) test was applied to TiO2 ENMs and the colored substances sodium picramate and Rhodamine B. A left shifting of concentration-response curves, with increasing light path lengths, indicated shading for Rhodamine B, sodium picramate and TiO2 ENMs. EC50-values obtained at the shortest light path length were generally found best suited to quantify the toxicity of ENMs and colored substances. The second approach addresses shading at the cellular level, where particles can attach to the cell surface and affect photo-pigment content and composition. Pigments associated with photosystem I and II were determined at varying light intensities and concentrations of TiO2 ENMs. The photo-pigments that increased in response to physical shading, decreased after TiO2 ENMs exposure. This indicates that toxicity rather than cellular shading dominated the response of algae exposed to TiO2 ENMs. Additional tests were conducted with the nanomaterials CeO2 and goethite to evaluate the applicability of this approach to other ENMs. On this basis, we recommend MPL testing for determining EC50-values that are not confounded by shading in the test solution, and the pigment-based approach for investigating shading on the cellular level.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Susanne Kruse and Emma Lóven Slott for their contributions to the experimental work.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Notes

1 Photosystem I primarily consist of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments, zeaxanthin, lutein and carotene (α and β), while PS II mainly consist of chlorophyll and xanthophylls (violaxanthin and antheraxanthin). Neoxanthin is both a carotenoid and xanthophyll and is produced from violaxanthin.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (HARMLESS, No. 953183 & PATROLS, No. 760813). We acknowledge the Global Product Compliance (GPC) – Group for supplying test substance and additional funding.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.