1,151
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original papers

Very low wear of non-remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: An RSA study lasting up to 6 years

, , &
Pages 739-745 | Received 23 Aug 2006, Accepted 27 Dec 2006, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Background and purpose Highly cross-linked polyethylenes (PEs) all appear to reduce wear dramatically in laboratory studies, although there is substantial variation in this respect between manufacturers. Nonremelted cross-linked PE is almost as tough as unirradiated PE, but is not completely stable and can oxidize in vivo, as has been shown in recent retrievals studies.

We had reported low wear and good clinical performance after 2 years for 10 non-remelted highly crosslinked PE cups compared to 16 conventional PE cups sterilized by gamma-in-air.

Method Because of possible degradation by free radicals, we followed up both cohorts for 5 years (conventional PE) and 6 years (highly cross-linked PE).

Result Mean (CI) proximal head penetration over the observation time was linear and measured 0.08 (0.02–0.13) mm for cross-linked PE and 0.42 (0.23–0.62) mm for conventional PE, and total penetration was 0.23 (0.1–0.35) mm and 0.75 (0.05–1.4) mm respectively. After subtracting creep, the annual wear for non-remelted highly cross-linked PE was below 6 µm. The cups had equally low migration and few radiolucencies.

Interpretation The theoretical possibility of oxidation in non-remelted highly cross-linked PE may not show clinically. However, it may be that cemented cups with their thicker PE are more forgiving than metal-backed cups with thin PE moving in the locking mechanism. So far, we can conclude that the Crossfire highly crosslinked polyethylene cups performed very well clinically, with extremely low wear even after almost 6 years. This is reassuring, but care should be taken in extrapolating these results to other cross-linked PEs or uncemented cups where toughness of PE is more of an issue.

Contributions of authors

BN: initiated the study. SMR, KGN and MGL: collected the data and performed the analysis. SMR: wrote the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and contributed to the final paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.