396
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Home safety evaluation – getting it right

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 652-657 | Received 29 Apr 2020, Accepted 30 Jul 2020, Published online: 11 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

Comprehensive and efficient home safety assessments are needed to provide quality interventions for community living. This study explores early career and experienced home evaluator perspectives on content and usability of HESTIA, a home safety assessment app.

Method

Four early career and five experienced practitioners rated the HESTIA app using the uMARS usability evaluation and then participated in focus groups. Data were analysed using a key concept analytic approach.

Results

Results include “how to do” home safety evaluations and how prompts and training help practitioners “get it right.” Early practitioner participants viewed the step-wise processes of the app as necessary whereas the experienced evaluators relied on own knowledge and experiences.

Conclusions

Gobet and Chassy’s TempT theory provides insight into the development of expertise in practice for rehabilitation professionals. The procedural complexities of assessment and ethical responsibility to provide competent, quality service to clients with disabilities are integrated into discussion of the development of professional intuition and ethical practice as guided by HESTIA.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Home safety evaluations and home modifications are essential in helping persons with disabilities to live at home.

  • Mobile applications such as HESTIA can serve as beneficial supports in facilitating effective decision making processes for rehabilitation practitioners conducting home safety evaluations.

  • Technology driven assessments through mobile applications (apps) can help improve proper decision making and client outcomes, as well as aid in the development of intuition in students and early-career practitioners.

  • Decision making support systems can help practitioners uphold their ethical responsibility to provide competent and quality rehabilitative services.

Acknowledgements

The contents of this report do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The contents of this report were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research [NIDILRR grant number 90IF0083-01-00], NIDILRR is a Centre within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.