Reverse homodigital dorsoradial flaps for thumb coverage obtained good sensory recovery after a long time follow up

Abstract

Reverse homodigital dorsoradial flap (RHDF) of the thumb has become a qualified option for the reconstruction of thumb tissue defects. However, the sensory recovery of the flap in long term is still unknown. Therefore, this study focused on the sensory recovery of RHDFs for the coverage of thumb in hand after a long-term follow-up. From January 2010 to March 2011, 18 patients (14 men and four women) were treated consecutively with an RHDF. All the patients were followed up two times. The pain and cold intolerance of the flap were self-reported by the patients. The sensory recovery of the flap was evaluated using Semmes–Weinstein (SW) monofilament, moving two-point discrimination (M-2PD) and static two-point discrimination (S-2PD) tests. The average times of the first and second follow-up were 39 ± 4 and 88 ± 6 months, respectively. The mean value of SW monofilament sensitivity score and M-2PD at first follow-up was significantly higher than that of the second follow-up and contralateral thumb. The mean value of S-2PD at the second follow-up was significantly lower than that of the first follow-up and higher than that of the contralateral thumb. The cold intolerance severity score (CISS) at the first follow-up was higher than that at the second follow-up. No significant difference was found in terms of the pain between the two follow-ups. RHDFs without nerve coaptation for thumb coverage could obtain good sensory recovery after a long-term follow-up. Abbreviations: RHDF: reverse homodigital dorsoradial flap; CISS: cold intolerance severity score; SW: Semmes–Weinstein monofilament sensitivity score; M-2PD: moving two-point discrimination; S-2PD: static two-point discrimination; VAS: visual analog scale.

Keywords:

• Sensory recovery
• reverse homodigital dorsoradial flap of the thumb
• sensory rehabilitation

Disclosure statement

None of the authors of this manuscript have any commercial association that might pose or create a conflict of interest with the information presented in the submitted manuscript.