Is conservative management of partial zone II flexor tendon laceration possible? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: There is still no consensus on managing zone II level partial flexor tendon lacerations, and the management of zone II partial flexor tendon injuries is controversial. No reliable large cohort studies or metaanalysis papers on partial flexor tendon laceration management are available in PubMed or Embase.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Insight, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for primary research articles investigating outcomes of patients with partial flexor tendon injuries. The initial search was limited to human studies that were published from 1970–2021 and indexed as randomized controlled or clinical trials or observational, cross-sectional, or cohort studies. We used statistical package R version 4.1.2 for this meta-analysis.

Results: The Standardised mean difference (SMD) of the common effects model was 2.020 (95% CI; 1.583–2.457; P < 0.0001), indicating that the results of conservative treatment without surgical intervention are similar to surgical intervention or better in some articles. The SMD of the random effect model was 7.093 (95% CI; 1.090–13.096; P < 0.0206), indicating the same result. Higgins' I2 value was 97.6%, indicating serious heterogeneity.

Conclusions: In this first meta-analysis on flexor zone II conservative treatment, five papers with publication bias were analyzed. It is meaningful to verify the result of conservative treatment statistically. Even though this is a heterogeneous paper, conservative treatment seems to have a lot of benefits for the patient, including offering a fairly solid longterm prognosis with very few complications.

Keywords:

• Partial
• flexor tendon
• tendon laceration
• meta-analysis

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kyungpook National University Department of Statistics for their statistical review.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316096