https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9992-180X
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background: Universities’ responses to sexual violence have faced scrutiny for their lack of proactiveness and their failure to address campus socio-cultural norms that contribute to rape myth acceptance. The labels victim and survivor play a crucial role in shaping attitudes toward sexual violence, but there is limited research on how university students perceive these labels.
Objective: This paper explores sexual violence labels and their role in perpetuating rape culture. Undergraduate university students’ beliefs on using the label survivor instead of victim to describe someone who has experienced sexual violence were examined to consider how these labels create societal discourse on sexual violence.
Method: The study draws on qualitative data collected from undergraduate students in Canada and the United States through open-response questions in an interactive textbook. Data were analysed and interpreted using a multi-method approach that combined principles of Critical Discourse Analysis and Feminist Poststructuralism. Direct quotes and word clouds from participants’ responses are used as evidence and to visually display discourse.
Results: Findings revealed that participants recognised the negative societal discourses associated with the label victim and supported using survivor to challenge perceptions of sexual violence. Despite this, participants expressed hesitancy to adopt the label survivor because of the potential negative implications, such as the label promoting the allocation of individual blame, increasing barriers to justice, and reducing the perceived severity of sexual violence.
Conclusions: This study underscores the complexities of sexual violence labels, the influence of language in shaping societal perceptions, and the need for a more comprehensive and equitable approach to responding to sexual violence.
HIGHLIGHTS
Dichotomy of Labels and Nuanced Perceptions: Sexual violence labels shape identity perceptions. Participants dichotomised the labels victim and survivor, associating one with negative attributes and the other with positive attributes. However, nuanced views of how people perceive and identify with these labels challenge distinct categories. Victims being negatively perceived, while survivors are admired for their resiliency highlights complexities in societal expectations that may not fully address the underlying determinants of sexual violence.
Role of Language in Reproduction of Rape Culture: Poststructuralist theories emphasise the role of language in the production and maintenance of discourse. The study shows that victim discourse is steeped in rape myths. The historical discourse surrounding the label may contribute to the perpetuation of negative attitudes and behaviours toward victims of sexual violence. The emergence of the label survivor reflects a societal shift, but findings suggest this may lead to societal complacency towards sexual violence.
Spectrum of Severity and Societal Empathy: Participants’ understanding of sexual violence as a spectrum of severity may lead to unequal levels of empathy and support. This discourse creates positions of dominance and oppression, potentially marginalising certain groups who are disproportionately affected by sexual violence. The study highlights how severity discourse can influence institutional agendas and may result in political and institutional neglect of sexual violence.
Antecedentes: Las respuestas de las universidades a la violencia sexual han sido objeto de escrutinio por su falta de proactividad y su incapacidad para abordar las normas socioculturales del campus que contribuyen a la aceptación del mito de la violación. Las etiquetas de víctima y sobreviviente desempeñan un papel crucial en la formación de actitudes hacia la violencia sexual, pero hay pocas investigaciones sobre cómo perciben estas etiquetas los estudiantes universitarios.
Objetivo: Este artículo explora las etiquetas de violencia sexual y su papel en la perpetuación de la cultura de la violación. Se examinaron las creencias de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de la etiqueta ‘sobreviviente’ en lugar de ‘víctima’ para describir a las personas que han sufrido violencia sexual con el fin de considerar cómo estas etiquetas crean un discurso social sobre la violencia sexual.
Método: El estudio se basa en datos cualitativos recogidos de estudiantes universitarios de Canadá y Estados Unidos mediante preguntas de respuesta abierta en un libro de texto interactivo. Los datos se analizaron e interpretaron utilizando un enfoque multimétodo que combinaba principios del Análisis Crítico del Discurso y del Postestructuralismo Feminista. Las citas directas y las nubes de palabras de las respuestas de los participantes se utilizan como pruebas y para mostrar visualmente el discurso.
Resultados: Los resultados revelaron que los participantes reconocían los discursos sociales negativos asociados a la etiqueta de víctima y apoyaban el uso de sobreviviente para cuestionar las percepciones sociales de la violencia sexual. A pesar de ello, los participantes se mostraron reticentes a adoptar la etiqueta de sobreviviente debido a las posibles implicaciones negativas, como que la etiqueta promueve la asignación de la culpa individual, aumenta las barreras a la justicia y reduce la gravedad percibida de la violencia sexual.
Conclusiones: Este estudio subraya las complejidades de las etiquetas de violencia sexual, la influencia del lenguaje en la formación de las percepciones sociales y la necesidad de un enfoque más integral y equitativo para responder a la violencia sexual.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author ([email protected]), the data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and the data containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.