2,668
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical

Using the ALSFRS-R in multicentre clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: potential limitations in current standard operating procedures

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 500-507 | Received 31 Oct 2021, Accepted 05 Dec 2021, Published online: 24 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Objective: Uniform data collection is fundamental for multicentre clinical trials. We aim to determine the variability, between ALS trial centers, in the prevalence of unexpected or implausible improvements in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) score, and its associations with individual patient and item characteristics.

Methods: We used data from two multicentre studies to estimate the prevalence of an unexpected increase or implausible improvement in the ALSFRS-R score, defined as an increase of 5 points or more between two consecutive, monthly visits. For each patient with a 5-point or more increase, we evaluated the individual contribution of each ALSFRS-R item.

Results: Longitudinal ALSFRS-R scores, originating from 114 trial centers enrolling a total of 1,240 patients, were analyzed. A 5-point or more increase in ALSFRS-R total score was found in 151 (12.2%) patients, with prevalence per study center ranging from 0% to 83%. Bulbar onset, faster disease progression at enrollment, and a lower ALSFRS-R score at baseline were associated with a sudden 5-point or more increase in the ALSFRS-R total score. ALSFRS-R items 2 (saliva), 9 (stairs), 10 (dyspnea), and 11 (orthopnea) were the primary drivers when a 5-point or more increase occurred.

Conclusions: Sudden 5-point or more increases in ALSFRS-R total scores between two consecutive visits are relatively common. These sudden increases were not found to occur with equal frequency in trial centers; which underscores the need for amending existing standard operating procedures toward a universal version and monitoring of data quality during the study, in multicentre research.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the ALS patients who participated in the dexpramipexole and ozanezumab trials, and their contribution to the search for a cure for ALS. We would also like to thank Biogen and GlaxoSmithKline for sharing their clinical research data.

Declaration of interest

L. Kendall and N. Epstein are current and S.S. Han and A. Lavrov former employees of GlaxoSmithKline and held shares in the company. The other authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Netherlands ALS foundation