113
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Do we really need to calculate a minimal important difference for ALSFRS-R?: A letter in response to ‘Clinically meaningful change: evaluation of the Rasch-built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) and the ALSFRS-R’ published in Vol. 24(3–4), pp. 311–316

ORCID Icon
Pages 214-215 | Received 26 Jul 2023, Accepted 08 Aug 2023, Published online: 30 Aug 2023
 
This article is related to:
Clinically meaningful change: evaluation of the Rasch-built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) and the ALSFRS-R
View responses to this article:
The importance of understanding minimal important difference for ALSFRS-R: A reply to ‘Do we really need to calculate a minimal important difference for ALSFRS-R?’ https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2023.2248199

Conflicts of interest and competing interests

Dr Vázquez- Costa is funded by grants of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (JR19/00030, PI Vázquez) and received personal fees from Biogen and Roche outside the submitted work.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.