Living law, normative pluralism, and “fare dodging” on public transport in Budapest

Abstract

This paper explores a situation regulated by plural normative orders, which every-day public transport users and ticket inspectors experience and practice in the urban realm of the Hungarian capital city, Budapest. The paper analyses everyday interactions between members of the public and public transport staff (typically ticket inspectors) in ways which are not only regulated by formal rules, but which manifest in a non-state regulated normative order. By doing this, the paper theoretically engages with the interplay between multiple normative orders and the urban dynamics in which they operate. The norms which regulate these practices can exist because of how the public transport system operates in Budapest. The paper is based on twenty-five in-depth interviews conducted between February 2017 and March 2019 with long-term Hungarian residents and British migrants living in Budapest. A synthesis of Ehrlich’s “living law” theory and Moore’s concepts of “semi-autonomous social fields” provide the underlying theoretical framework to examine these informal interactions.

Keywords:

• Hungary
• living law
• normative pluralism
• informality
• urban dynamics

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 The BKK is a state-funded institution as it owned by Budapest Council. The regulations set out by the BKK are also understood as formal (state) law for the purposes of this paper.