23
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Age of Acquisition of Motor Abilities in Infants:

Comparison of Knowledge Sources

Pages 27-38 | Published online: 29 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Pediatric physical and occupational therapists rely on knowledge of the age of acquisition of motor abilities in infancy in order to identify those at-risk infants exhibiting delays. Sources of this knowledge include clinical authorities. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the validity of the age of acquisition of specific motor abilities reported in two recently published clinical observation sources by comparing them with the data obtained systematically in the normative study of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Overall, 43 percent of the AIMS items were reported to occur earlier in the clinical observation sources than were indicated by the normative data. The negative consequences associated with potential false positives when using one of these two clinical observation souces suggest that rehabilitation therapists use a norm-referenced, large sample test, such as the AIMS, when identifying infants who are delated in early motor development.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.