Abstract
A Markov model was constructed to simulate the resource use and health outcomes of one year of treatment comparing the fentanyl transdermal therapeutic system (fentanyl-TTS) with oral sustained-release (SR) morphine in outpatients with noncancer pain in Denmark. Effectiveness was assessed in terms of days of good pain control and days on initial treatment. Costs included those of baseline pain management, including breakthrough pain; co-medication costs; and control of adverse events. Fentanyl-TTS was more effective than SR-morphine in achieving good pain control (99 vs. 64 days, respectively) and the incremental cost-effectiveness of fentanyl-TTS was US $10.26 per extra day of good pain control. Patients treated with fentanyl-TTS remained considerably longer on initial treatment compared with those treated with SR-morphine (166 days vs. 117 days, respectively). The results of this study suggest that fentanyl-TTS is a competitive therapeutic and economic choice for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Andreas Frei
Cherokee Layson-Wolf, PharmD, is Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. At the time that this review was conducted, she was a Community Care Pharmacy Practice Resident at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Perry G. Fine, MD, is Professor of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Associate Medical Director, Pain Management Center at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City; and National Medical Director, VistaCare, based in Scottsdale, AZ. This commentary is based on an article in Dr. Fine's VistaCare Palliative Medicine Monitor.
Jonathan R. Gavrin, MD, is the Internet editor for the Journal. He is Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine; Associate Member, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; and Associate Director for Clinical Anesthesia Services, Harborview Medical Center.
Philip J. Wiffen, is the Regional Pharmaceutical and Prescribing Adviser, Anglia & Oxford Region of the National Health Service Executive, a member of the Oxford Regional Pain Relief Unit and Coordinating Editor of the Cochrane Collaboration Pain Palliative and Supportive Care Collaborative Review Group.
Philip J. Wiffen, BPharm, MRPharmS, MFPHM (Hon) is Regional Pharmaceutical and Prescribing Adviser, Anglia & Oxford Region of the National Health Service Executive, a member of the Pain Relief Unit, Churchill Hospital, and Coordinating Editor, Cochrane Collaboration Pain Palliative and Supportive Care Collaborative Review Group.
Howard A. Heit, practices pain medicine and addiction medicine in Fairfax, Virginia, and is Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Dr. Heit was a member of the Liaison Committee on Pain and Addiction.