160
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Use of treatment guidelines in clinical decision making in bipolar disorder: a pilot survey of clinicians

Pages 467-475 | Accepted 21 Dec 2006, Published online: 25 Jan 2007
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: With recent attention to the importance of evidence-based medicine in psychiatry, a number of treatment guidelines have emerged to aid clinicians in clinical decision making. The objective of this study was to assess the extent to which such guidelines are used in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Methods: In November 2005, self-administered questionnaires were sent to 7000 psychiatrists who treat bipolar disorder in their clinical practice. An additional mailing of these questionnaires was done in January 2006 to a different group of 7000 psychiatrists who also treat bipolar disorder in their clinical practice. The first 312 completed surveys were analyzed. Eight questions relevant to clinical usage of, and attitudes toward, existing guidelines were asked.

Results: Among the 312 respondents, 64.1% reported making routine use of treatment guidelines when making clinical decisions, including 19.6% who used the American Psychiatric Association treatment guidelines and 33.0% who used all published guidelines. Of those who did not use bipolar guidelines, the most frequently cited reason given by respondents (20.1%) was that such guidelines do not address particular features of their clinical populations. Among the different types of practice, private individual practice gave this answer most frequently (27.5%).

Conclusions: These results suggest that, despite considerable efforts to develop and disseminate evidence-based guidelines, they are not widely implemented and substantial opportunities exist to educate clinicians about their value and relevance. Limitations of the study include a low response rate and possible selection bias. Nonethe­less, this project was conceived of as a pilot study and these limitations do not negate the findings, but suggest other avenues for investigation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.