195
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Oral nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and vertebral fractures

&
Pages 2669-2677 | Accepted 28 Jul 2008, Published online: 08 Aug 2008
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture. They are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and also predict future vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk. Bisphosphonates are the current mainstay for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Health authority guidelines request that assessment of vertebral fracture risk reduction is part of the evaluation of bisphosphonate efficacy. In this review, we compare the published evidence for the efficacy of the nitrogen-containing oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures.

Methods: A review of publications in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and the most frequently prescribed oral bisphosphonate therapies (alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate) was carried out using the Dialog (Embase and Medline) and Cochrane online scientific citation databases. Eligible publications were those reporting randomized, placebo-controlled trials that included vertebral fracture as the primary or secondary endpoint (any time-point).

Results: Of 159 publications identified, six studies assessing alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate met the pre-defined eligibility criteria. In total, 14 083 women were included in the studies, with 8182 patients receiving active treatment. Most studies were 3 years in duration. Discontinuation rates varied from 11 to 45%, being highest in those studies that specified one or more vertebral fracture as part of the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, the reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures ranged from 41 to 62% (44–48% for alendronate; 41–49% for risedronate; 62% for ibandronate).

Conclusions: Nitrogen-containing oral bisphosphonates effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture, with the magnitude of effect ranging from 41 to 62%.

Acknowledgements

Declaration of interest: The authors would like to acknowledge medical writing assistance provided by Mary Hand (Gardiner-Caldwell Communications) in the preparation of this manuscript, funding for which was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche and GlaxoSmithKline.

The authors, who are also guarantors of the manuscript content and who provided final sign-off, conceived the manuscript. The sponsors had no role in identifying manuscripts for inclusion in this review. No funding was given to any author for the preparation of this manuscript.

GB has received honoraria and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering Plough, Servier, and Wyeth. PS receives remuneration for consulting and lectures from Roche/GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, sanofi-aventis, Servier and Amgen.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.