341
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pain: Brief report

Meaningful cut-off pain intensity for breakthrough pain changes in advanced cancer patients

, , , , , & show all
Pages 93-97 | Accepted 29 Nov 2012, Published online: 13 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

Objectives:

To assess the level of pain intensity at which patients feel the impetus to ask for a breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) medication, and level of pain intensity at which patients consider they have achieved acceptable pain control after receiving a BTcP medication.

Methods:

A consecutive sample of patients who were receiving oral morphine equivalents equal to or more than 60 mg daily, and were prescribed rapid onset opioids for the management of episodes of BTcP, were included in the study. Focused educational activities regarding BTcP and numerical scales were established during hospital admission. At discharge patients were interviewed to find out what was the pain intensity level which gave the impetus to take the BTcP medication, what was the pain intensity for acceptable pain control after a BTcP medication had been given, and which factors prevented the patient calling for BTcP medication. A brief COPE (coping orientation to problems experienced) questionnaire was also administered.

Results:

Fifty-two patients were recruited for this study. The meaningful pain intensity for asking for a BTcP medication was 7.1; 77% of patients had a pain intensity of 7–8 on a numerical scale of 0–10. The meaningful pain intensity for adequate analgesia after a BTcP medication was 3.5. Similarly, 77% of patients had a pain intensity of 3–4. There was no relationship with the variables examined. Concerns by patients about the use of BTcP medications were minimal.

Conclusion:

The meaningful BTcP intensity and pain intensity expected after BTcP medication can be useful in selecting patients in studies of BTcP. The principal limitation of this study was the specific setting of an acute unit with specific features and the relatively low number of patients. This observation should be followed up by further surveys with a larger number of patients and different settings.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The authors received no payment in preparation of this manuscript.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

S.M. has served on the Speakers Bureaus for Grunenthal, Janssen, Teva, Molteni and ProStrakan. C.A., R.T., A.V., F.F., A.G., and A.C. have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with or financial interests in any commercial companies related to this study or article.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the nurses of the unit of La Maddalena cancer center, and the staff of psycho-oncologists of the University of Turin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.