595
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Respiratory: Original articles

Tobramycin inhalation powder manufactured by improved process in cystic fibrosis: the randomized EDIT trial

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 947-956 | Accepted 10 May 2013, Published online: 05 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

Background:

Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) was reported to be effective in two Phase III studies in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). The EDIT study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TIP manufactured by an improved process in CF subjects aged 6–21 years.

Methods:

CF patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥25% to ≤80% predicted, positive Pa cultures and inhaled antipseudomonal therapy naïve (or at least for past 4 months) were enrolled into this double-blind, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to receive TIP or placebo (1:1) twice daily for one treatment cycle (28.5 days on drug, 28 days off drug). The primary endpoint was relative change in FEV1 percentage predicted from baseline to day 29. A pre-specified sensitivity analysis evaluated absolute change in FEV1% predicted. Other endpoints included Pa sputum density and safety.

Results:

A total of 62 patients out of a target of 100 (mean age 12.9 years, baseline FEV1 59.2% predicted, Pa sputum density 7.4 log10 colony forming units [CFU] per gram) were randomized. Mean treatment differences (TIP - placebo) were 5.9% (p = 0.148) and 4.4% (p < 0.05) for relative and absolute change in FEV1% predicted respectively. TIP significantly reduced Pa sputum density by −1.2 log10 CFU (p = 0.002). Treatment with TIP was well tolerated.

Conclusions:

Relative change in FEV1% predicted with TIP treatment was in the expected range based on the literature, but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo. Placebo control and use of treatment naïve patients led to significant recruitment challenges and an underpowered study with consequent impact on the generated data. However, significant improvements in other outcomes including absolute change in FEV1% predicted and reduction in Pa sputum density indicate that TIP is efficacious and well tolerated in CF patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00918957.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The study was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG. Novartis was responsible for the design of the study and analysis of the data and, in collaboration with the authors, was involved in interpretation and presentation of the data for this report.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

A.G.C. and I.G. received reimbursement from Novartis to cover their costs as clinical investigators for this study. M.W.K. has consulting relationships with Aradigm, CSL-Behring, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, KaloBios, Gilead Sciences, Insmed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. G.A., F.B. and M.H. are employees of Novartis. S.P. and K.T. were employees of Novartis at the time this study was conducted.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have received honoraria for their review work, but have no other relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors were assisted in the preparation of the manuscript by Mary Sayers, professional medical writer contracted to CircleScience (Macclesfield, UK), and Mark Fedele (Novartis). Writing support was funded by the study sponsor.

Previous presentation: The 35th European Cystic Fibrosis Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 6–9 June 2012. Abstract publication: Galeva I, Konstan MW, Higgins M et al. A challenging double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis: results of the EDIT trial. J Cyst Fibros 2012;11(Suppl 1):S12.

Notes

1Tobi is a registered trade name of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

2TIP is a registered trade name of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.