1,122
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

US practitioner prescribing practices and patient characteristics of those newly treated with a buprenorphine transdermal patch system

, , &
Pages 1579-1587 | Accepted 04 Mar 2014, Published online: 04 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

Objectives:

Medication prescribing information provides guidance to healthcare providers on how to prescribe a drug properly. Oftentimes patient factors in addition to the prescribing information are considered when selecting medications. Utilizing real-world pharmacy and medical claims data, this study assessed US practitioner prescribing practices of US approved transdermal buprenorphine system (BTDS) in relation to BTDS’s full prescribing information (FPI) as well as the relationship between patient factors and initial BTDS dose.

Research design and methods:

Patients aged ≥18 years initiating BTDS between 1 January 2011 and 30 November 2011 were identified in the IMS Pharmacy and Private Practitioner Medical Claims databases. The index date was defined as the first filled BTDS prescription. Demographics, chronic pain-related medical conditions in the 12 months pre-index and prior medication use in the 6 months pre-index were assessed. Initial BTDS dosing strength, receipt of approved initial BTDS dose per the FPI, and concomitant medications were assessed in the post-index 6 month period.

Results:

The study included 10,457 patients newly treated with BTDS. The majority of patients were female (69.9%) with a mean (±SD) age of 54.5 (±15.2) years. Within the 6 months prior to the index BTDS prescription, 91.7% of the patients used opioids. Overall, 48.9% of patients were prescribed the FPI approved BTDS dose. When stratified, 73.5% of opioid-naïve patients received the FPI approved initial dose compared to 46.0% of those with prior opioid experience of ≤80 mg morphine-equivalent daily dose. Patients on BTDS alone (i.e. monotherapy) had a higher rate of receiving the FPI approved initial BTDS dose compared to patients on BTDS concomitant regimens (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Practitioners demonstrated that they prescribe in accordance with BTDS’s prescribing information in the majority of opioid-naïve patients and in approximately half of opioid-experienced patients. The initial opioid dose is a critical step in treatment, setting the stage for preventing side-effects and improving treatment effectiveness. Understanding practitioner prescribing practices with regard to the initial dose selection of BTDS may provide insight on how to improve outcomes of care and reduce healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with pain management.

Limitations:

Data obtained from prescription claims reflect only the activities of prescriptions filled, not medication use or other clinical characteristics observed by physicians when treating patients.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

Funding of the study was provided by Purdue Pharma, Stamford, CT, USA.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

J.V.P. has disclosed that he is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma LP, Baxter International Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Insys Therapeutics and Collegium Pharmaceutical. R.B.-J. has disclosed that he is an employee of Purdue Pharma. G.H. has disclosed that he was employed by IMS Health at the time of the study, which received study funding from Purdue Pharma LP. He is now an employee of Symphony Health Solutions. C.-L.C. has disclosed that she is an employee of IMS Health.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dhvani Shah MS for her assistance during data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Notes

*Butrans is a registered trade name of Purdue Pharma, Stamford, CT, USA

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.