272
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Introduction of higher doses of deferasirox: better efficacy but not effective iron removal from the heart and increased risks of serious toxicities

Pages 633-641 | Published online: 16 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Importance of the field: Thousands of iron loaded patients are using deferasirox, who are not aware of the new, fatal and irreversible serious toxic side effects, the need for prophylaxis and the availability of more effective and less toxic chelation therapies.

Areas covered in this review: Updating on efficacy issues in relation to the introduction of higher deferasirox doses and comparison to existing chelation therapies. A new maximum dose of 40 mg/kg/day has been introduced for deferasirox in an attempt to achieve negative iron balance in thalassemia and other transfused iron loaded patients. A marginal increase in cardiac iron removal using doses of 30 – 40 mg/kg/day suggests that the rate of iron removal by deferasirox is insufficient by comparison to the deferiprone/deferoxamine combination, where total and rapid clearance of excess cardiac iron and normalization of the body iron stores could be achieved.

What the reader will gain: Identification of drug interactions and new fatal and permanent toxic side effects of deferasirox and implications on efficacy, toxicity and cost of using higher doses. Deferasirox has been identified to cause fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhages, renal tubulopathy, hepatic and renal failure, alopecia and anaphylactic reactions in addition to previously reported fatal or serious toxic side effects such as agranulocytosis, renal and hepatic toxicity, skin rash and gastric intolerance. Interactions with UDP-glucuronosyl transferase inducers, CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 substrates and drugs affecting enterohepatic recycling are likely to affect deferasirox's efficacy and toxicity. Increased toxicity is expected from the use of higher doses of deferasirox and regular prophylactic monitoring is required to avoid fatal and permanent toxicity incidences. The increased costs from higher doses of deferasirox will mostly affect patients living in the developing countries.

Take home message: Only few patients may benefit from the introduction of higher doses of deferasirox. There is a need for introducing more effective prophylactic measures. Safer, more effective and less costly chelation treatments are available using deferiprone, deferoxamine and their combination.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.