Abstract
The development of targeted therapies has led to a revolution in non-small-cell lung cancer, and opened up possibilities for improved personalized medicine. With the constant findings of new targets, a lot of inhibitors are being developed. However, reliable biomarkers are urgently needed. The design of clinical trials needs to become more flexible in order to obtain the best results and gain the US FDA/EMEA approval for the new drugs. A recent example of a failed trial is the Phase III MetLung trial that compared the effects of the c-MET monovalent antibody onartuzumab with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, we discuss several points as to why this trial could have failed.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.