311
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Therapeutic options for human brucellosis

Pages 109-120 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Worldwide, human brucellosis is the most common zoonotic disease and it has gained increasing interest because of the potential use of Brucella as a biological weapon. Monotherapy for brucellosis is associated with a high relapse rate and dual therapy in different combinations is more efficacious. The combination regimen of intramuscular streptomycin with an oral tetracycline resulted in fewer relapses than the doxycycline–rifampin combination in meta-analysis and prospective studies, although the use of doxycycline and rifampin is a reasonable choice in certain conditions. Longer duration and triple antimicrobial therapy appear to improve outcome and prevent relapses, especially in patients with focal disease. Recently, the use of gentamicin-loaded microparticles and the use of new antibiotics, such as tigecycline, may hold future promise. In addition, there are a few studies of the enhanced effect of immune response stimulators, such as levimasole and IFN-2, in the treatment of brucellosis. The development of an effective subcellular Brucella vaccine would be an important step forward to curtail the disease. However, currently and for the near future, only the control of animal disease is possible using vaccine strategies.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the use of Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SAMSO) facilities for the research data utilized in this manuscript. Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily of SAMSO.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.