624
Views
90
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Report

Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian and breast cancers in BRCA mutation carriers: a meta-analysis

, , &
Pages 1197-1207 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is currently the only effective strategy available for decreasing ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Significantly decreased risk of ovarian cancer associated with the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) was shown in the general population, which could be an alternative approach for those who do not accept risk-reducing surgery. Cohort, case–control and case–case studies published in English up to December 2009 reporting the association of ovarian or breast cancer risk with the use of COCs and presenting BRCA status were selected for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of three case–control studies showed a significant risk reduction of ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who were associated with any past COC use (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47–0.70; p < 0.001) and significant trend by duration of COC use (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93–0.97; p < 0.001). No significant increase in breast cancer risk associated with COC use has been found in case–control studies in BRCA1 (OR: 1.08; p = 0.250), in BRCA2 (OR: 1.03; p = 0.788) mutation carriers or in case–case studies in BRCA1/2 carriers (OR: 0.80; p = 0.147). Significantly increased risk of breast cancer was only shown on a subset of cohort studies in BRCA1 mutation carriers (OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.14–1.92). In conclusion, meta-analysis confirmed significantly decreased ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers associated with the use of COCs comparable to the relative extent shown in the general population. Data on the risk of breast cancer associated with COC use in BRCA mutation carriers are heterogeneous and results are inconsistent. COCs can be considered as an alternative strategy in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers who do not accept prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy above the age of 30 years.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Ministry of Health Care (projects IGA, nos. 10621-2 and 301/08/P103). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.