Synergistic Effects of Resistive Breathing on Endotoxin-Induced Lung Injury in Mice

Abstract

Introduction

Resistive breathing (RB) is characterized by forceful contractions of the inspiratory muscles, mainly the diaphragm, resulting in large negative intrathoracic pressure and mechanical stress imposed on the lung. We have shown that RB induces lung injury in healthy animals. Whether RB exerts additional injurious effects when added to pulmonary or extrapulmonary lung injury is unknown. Our aim was to study the synergistic effect of RB on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung injury.

Methods

C57BL/6 mice inhaled an LPS aerosol (10mg/3mL) or received an intraperitoneal injection of LPS (10 mg/kg). Mice were then anaesthetized, the trachea was surgically exposed, and a nylon band of a specified length was sutured around the trachea, to provoke a reduction of the surface area at 50%. RB through tracheal banding was applied for 24 hours. Respiratory system mechanics were measured, BAL was performed, and lung sections were evaluated for histological features of lung injury.

Results

LPS inhalation increased BAL cellularity, mainly neutrophils (p < 0.001 to ctr), total protein and IL-6 in BAL (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and increased the lung injury score (p = 0.001). Lung mechanics were not altered. Adding RB to inhaled LPS further increased BAL cellularity (p < 0.001 to LPS inh.), total protein (p = 0.016), lung injury score (p = 0.001) and increased TNFa levels in BAL (p = 0.011). Intraperitoneal LPS increased BAL cellularity, mainly macrophages (p < 0.001 to ctr.), total protein levels (p = 0.017), decreased static compliance (p = 0.004) and increased lung injury score (p < 0.001). Adding RB further increased histological features of lung injury (p = 0.022 to LPS ip).

Conclusion

Resistive breathing exerts synergistic injurious effects when combined with inhalational LPS-induced lung injury, while the additive effect on extrapulmonary lung injury is less prominent.

Keywords:

• endotoxin
• resistive breathing
• lung
• inflammation
• injury

Data Sharing Statement

The data of the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval

Experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Experimental Surgery Department of “Evangelismos” hospital and follow the European Union Directive (2010/63/EU) on the protection of laboratory animals used for scientific causes.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in this work.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Thorax Foundation (Athens, Greece).