Abstract
Purpose
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. Risk assessment provides information about patient prognosis, contributing to the risk stratification of patients and the rational allocation of medical resources. We aimed to develop a model for individualized prediction of renal function decline in patients with type 2 DKD (T2DKD).
Patients and Methods
In a retrospective observational study, we followed 307 T2DKD patients and evaluated the determinants of 1) risk of doubling in serum creatinine (Scr), 2) risk of eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73m2 using potential risk factors at baseline. A prediction model represented by a nomogram and a risk table was developed using Cox regression and externally validated in another cohort with 206 T2DKD patients. The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve, respectively.
Results
Four predictors were selected to establish the final model: Scr, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, plasma albumin, and insulin treatment. The nomogram achieved satisfactory prediction performance, with a C-index of 0.791 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.762–0.820] in the derivation cohort and 0.793 (95% CI 0.746–0.840) in the external validation cohort. Then, all predictors were scored according to their weightings. A risk table with the highest score of 11.5 was developed. The C-index of the risk table was 0.764 (95% CI: 0.731–0.797), which was similar to the external validation cohort (0.763; 95% CI: 0.714–0.812). Additionally, the patients were divided into two groups based on the risk table, and significant differences in the probability of outcome events were observed between the high-risk (score >2) and low-risk (score ≤2) groups in the derivation and external validation cohorts (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The nomogram and the risk table using readily available clinical parameters could be new tools for bedside prediction of renal function decline in T2DKD patients.
Graphical Abstract
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University (2019ZDSYLL057-P01) and was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the contributors and clinical subjects of this study.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.